162 Ohio App. 3d 55 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2020
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Baker v. Carr · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the petitioner bears the initial burden to submit evidentiary documents containing sufficient operative facts to demonstrate the lack of competent counsel and that the defense was prejudiced by counsel's ineffectiveness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is a mixed question of law and fact, which means that factual issues are reviewed under a manifest weight of the evidence standard, and legal issues are reviewed de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.