Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Ohio App. 3d 672 - State v. Carroll

162 Ohio App. 3d 672 - State v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 889 F. Supp. 2d 1014 - Render v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (2012), State v. Lee (2019)

25 state decisions

150200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Maurer · State v. Darrah · 5 Ohio App. 2d 122 - State v. Terry · 82 Ohio App. 3d 286 - City of Garfield Heights v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An arrest occurs when the following four requisite elements are involved: (1) an intent to arrest, (2) under a real or pretended authority, (3) accompanied by an actual or constructive seizure or detention of the person, and (4) which is so understood by the person arrested.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[A]n officer need not state, "You are under arrest.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.