162 Ohio App. 3d 730 - State v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
79 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably 184 Ohio App. 3d 675 - State v. Pilgrim (2009), State v. Beal (2021)
79 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · State v. King · State v. Pachay · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing a speedy-trial issue, an appellate court must calculate the number of days chargeable to either party and determine whether the appellant was properly brought to trial within the time limits set forth in R.C. 2945.71.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Duncan · State v. Morgan“The right to a speedy trial is guaranteed to all state criminal defendants by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution * * * and by Section 10 , Article I of the Ohio Constitution.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“reasonable speedy trial periods consistent with these constitutional provisions.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.