Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Okla. 30 - Ex Parte Holmes

Ex Parte Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2020

8 state decisions

401933194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grantham v. City of Chickasha · In Re Lankford · Ex Parte Russum · Shipley Baking Co. v. City of Hartshorne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen any fairly reasonable doubt exists as to the grant of the power, such doubt is resolved by the courts against the corporation, and the existence of the power is denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.