Grider v. Turnbow’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2006
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. Merchant · Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. Railroad · Oconto Co. v. Bacon · Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co. · Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is this apparent distinction between the effect of the vendor’s declaring a forfeiture and his institution of a suit for strict foreclosure: In the former instance he treats the contract as at an end and the vendee as no longer having any interest in the property, while by availing himself of the latter remedy he recognizes the vendee’s interest as continuing until foreclosed by the decree in his suit.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is necessary to view each pleading as a whole, and not to isolate any single allegation as determinative of the nature of the suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.