State v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo · 121 Wash. 2d 22 - State v. Riley · 101 Wash. 2d 664 - State v. Rupe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The problem is that the State did not offer any expert testimony to explain the actual or even potential effects methamphetamine could have had on Powell. Thus the jurors were left to speculate on this question from their own knowledge, knowing only that Powell was a law-breaking drug user.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Powell · State v. Powell“I don'thaven't heard any argument that its prejudicial effect is outweighed by its pro[bative] value.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Powell · State v. Powell“[i]n light of our disposition [rejecting the sufficiency of the evidence argument], we need not consider Powell's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.