162 So. 2d 574
Decided April 17, 1964
Relies on State v. Richardson · State v. Foret · Mercer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1964-04-17
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2004
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In re: Sam Green et al. applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.
¶2Writs denied. There are no perfected bills of exception. See La.Code Crim.Proc. Art. 499, LSA-R.S. 15:499; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. McDonald, 218 La. 198, 48 So.2d 797; State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606; 245 La. 187, 157 So.2d 733. Moreover, there is no error patent on the face of the record.