162 So. 3d 1284 - State v. Mack’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McDonald v. City of Chicago · Apodaca v. Oregon · State v. Martin · 449 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Watson · State v. Bertrand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur present jurisprudence provides that non-unanimous verdicts in noncapital felony cases do not violate the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendant makes no persuasive argument that non-unanimous verdicts in noncapital felony cases calling for mandatory life sentences without parole upon conviction call for a different result. Apodaca v. Oregon , 406 U.S. 404 , 92 S.Ct. 1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972) ; McDonald v. City of Chicago , 561 U.S. 742 , 130 S.Ct. 3020 , 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (recognizing Apodaca's continuing viability); State v. Bertrand , 2008-2215 (La. 3/17/09), 6 So.3d 738 ; State v. Curtis , 2011-1676 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/13/13) , 112 So.3d 323 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.