Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 So. 3d 371

In re Burnham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 5, 2015

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2015-03-05

Decided 2015-03-05

¶1In re: Timothy B. Burnham; — Plaintiff; Applying For Petition for Readmission Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 14-DB-003.

¶2L Readmission Denied.

KNOLL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part for reasons assigned.
KNOLL, J.,

¶3concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶4LI concur in the denial of petitioner’s readmission.

¶5I write separately to further note there is no absolute right for a disbarred attorney to seek readmission. Given the egregious nature of petitioner’s criminal and immoral conduct, I can conceive of no circumstance under which I would readmit petitioner to the practice of law in Louisiana. Under our plenary power over the practice of law, we should order that petitioner be prohibited from filing any application for readmission in the future.

¶6*372Thus, I object to allowing petitioner to reapply in three years and would permanently enjoin petitioner from reapplying in the future.

/162/so3d/371 · .json · Public domain