Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 So. 3d 732 - Neff v. Neff

162 So. 3d 732 - Neff v. Neff’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 348 So. 2d 75 - Pearce v. Pearce · Guillory v. Guillory · 693 So. 2d 264 - Baggett v. Baggett · 41 So. 3d 1175 - In Re Ohle · Bourg v. Bourg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our courts have previously found that fault for the purposes of spousal support is synonymous with the fault grounds previously entitling a spouse to separation or divorce, including adultery, habitual intemperance or excess, conviction of a felony, cruel treatment or outrages, public defamation, abandonment, an attempt on the other's life, fugitive status, and intentional non-support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a party who is in need of support and who is free from fault prior to the filing of a proceeding to terminate the marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.