Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 SO3D 750 - Hye v. State

Hye v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. Alabama · Schmuck v. United States · Miller v. Alabama · 35 Cal. 3d 510 - People v. Geiger · 19 Cal. 4th 108 - People v. Birks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven where there are two statutes covering the same crime, and there is a difference in the penalty between the two statutes, the [S]tate is under no obligation to prosecute under the statute with the lesser penalty. It may choose to prosecute under either, and so long as the choice is clear and unequivocal the defendant has no right to complain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[i]n reviewing the denial of a motion for JNOV, the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “that prior applicable precedent usually must be followed even though the case, if considered anew, might be decided differently by the current court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.