Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 Tex. Crim. 208

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1955

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1955-11-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1976

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1955-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BELCHER, Judge.

¶1The conviction is for aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $100.

¶2The indictment charges the offense to have been committed by appellant shooting a pistol at Johnnie Ed Simpson.

¶3The state’s testimony shows that Johnnie Ed Simpson and Robert Rice were travelling in an automobile along a public highway when the appellant and a companion in an automobile drove alongside their car and the appellant in a loud tone of voice and using profane language told them to “pull over or get off the road.” Witnesses Simpson and Rice testified that they then increased the speed of their car and that appellant’s car followed, and that after going a short distance they “heard a shot fired” and later while appellant’s car was behind them they heard “more shots fired.”

¶4It was shown that about two weeks prior to the date in question appellant was seen riding in an automobile with a pistol on the seat between him and his companion.

¶5On cross-examination, witnesses Simpson and Rice testified that they did not see a pistol in appellant’s possession or the possession of his companion, and further testified that from the sound of the “shots fired” they thought they were made by a pistol. They also testified that they did not hear the movement *209of any bullets after the gun fired and that no bullets struck either of them or their car.

¶6Appellant did not testify, but offered testimony that he was not on said highway at the time of the commission of the offense here alleged and that he did not have a pistol on the date in question.

¶7There is no direct evidence that the appellant or his companion had a pistol at the time alleged or that either fired a gun toward the alleged assaulted party.

¶8Therefore, the trial court erred in failing to respond to appellant’s exception and request that the jury be instructed on the law applicable to circumstantial evidence.

¶9The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

¶10Opinion approved by the court.

/162/texcrim/208 · .json · Public domain