Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 Tex. Crim. 265

Aleman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1955

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1955-12-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1991

3 state decisions

Relies on 99 Tex. Crim. 415 - Stalcup v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1955-12-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BELCHER, Judge.

¶1The conviction is for contributing to the delinquency of a minor; the punishment, 90 days in jail.

¶2In view of our disposition of this case a statement of the facts will be omitted.

¶3Attorneys for the state confess error in this cause and in doing so agree with the contention of the appellant that the complaint and information are void because the jurat on the *266complaint shows that the oath of the affiant was administered by one person in the name of another.

¶4The jurat on the complaint shows that the oath was adminstered to the affiant in the name of Jim Bates, County Attorney, Hidalgo County, Texas; Criminal District Attorney, Hidalgo County, Texas, by Raul L. Longoria, Assistant.

¶5The oath to the affiant, under the facts here presented, cannot be legally administered by the assistant in the name of his principal, and for that reason the complaint herein is void, as well as the information based thereon. 12 Texas Jur. 585, Sec. 258; Stalcup v. State, 99 Texas Cr. R. 415, 269 S.W. 1044.

¶6The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

¶7Opinion approved by the court.

/162/texcrim/265 · .json · Public domain