Morais v. Yee’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Crannell (2000), New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Franklin (1996)
1 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Tennessee v. Garner · California v. Hodari D. · Brower v. County of Inyo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ther jurisdictions have recognized a duty to conduct high-speed chases with due regard for the safety of all persons under substantially similar statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rochon v. State“factual disputes, material to the determination whether defendants acted with reckless disregard in conducting the pursuit, preclude[d] summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rochon v. State“We give the opposing party the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences in determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Webb v. LeClair
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.