State v. Varnell’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. United States · State v. Adel · State v. Bobic · 24 Wash. App. 78 - State v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he first step is to analyze the statute in question. Next, we review the statute's history. Finally, we perform a factual analysis as to the unit of prosecution because even where the legislature has expressed its view on the unit of prosecution, the facts in a particular case may reveal more than one "unit of prosecution" is present.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown · State v. Hall“[t]he number of victims is secondary to the statutory aim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hall · State v. Jensen“A person is guilty of criminal solicitation when, with intent to promote or facilitate the commission of a crime, he offers to give or gives money or other thing of value to another to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or which would establish complicity of such other person in its commission or attempted commission had such crime been attempted or committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.