Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Wis. 2d 521 - State v. Bergeron

162 Wis. 2d 521 - State v. Bergeron’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably 168 Wis. 2d 175 - State v. Jenkins (1992), Quintano v. People (2005)

38 state decisions

180199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lister v. United States · Stutzman v. Board of Education · United States v. Moya-Gomez · 96 Wis. 2d 48 - State v. Rabe · 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant who has raised a motion in limine generally preserves the right to appeal on the issue raised by the motion without also objecting at trial.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We conclude that it is appropriate to punish the Defendant separately for the transfers and the concealment because they are separate volitional acts. There was ample time for the Defendant to reflect on his actions and recommit himself to the criminal enterprise.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether the motion in limine relieves the party from having to object depends on whether the motion alerted the trial court to the same issue of fact or law that arises at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.