Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 W. Va. 212 - State v. Sims

162 W. Va. 212 - State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
3
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

97 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 169 W. Va. 191 - State v. Hatfield (1982), 172 W. Va. 295 - State v. Williams (1983)

97 state decisions

42019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. United States · McMann v. Richardson · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Tollett v. Henderson · Blackledge v. Allison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The crime of felony-murder in this State does not require proof of the elements of malice, premeditation or specific intent to kill. It is deemed sufficient if the homicide occurs accidentally during the commission of, or the attempt to commit, one of the enumerated felonies.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Before a guilty plea will be set aside based on the fact that the defendant was incompetently advised, it must be shown that (1) counsel did act incompetently; (2) the incompetency must relate to a matter which would have substantially affected the fact-finding process if the case had proceeded to trial; (3) the guilty plea must have been motivated by this error.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “W.Va.Code, 61-2-1, was not designed primarily to define the substantive elements of the particular types of first degree murder, but rather was enacted to categorize the common law crimes of murder for the purpose of setting degrees of punishment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.