Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1972
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sipple v. . the State · Deming v. . Terminal Railway of Buffalo · Boyce v. . Manhattan Railway Co. · In Re the Probate of the Will of Goldsticker · Fitzpatrick v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Reasonable care required special construction to provide for the safety of those invited by the state to a place of public entertainment provided by itself. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.