Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Ariz. 403 - Suncor Development v. Maricopa County

Suncor Development v. Maricopa County’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pima County v. Heinfeld · State v. Rice · Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co. · Magna Investment & Development Corp. v. Pima County · Arizona Department of Revenue v. Navopache Electric Co-Op, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) Proceedings before the [Tax] court are original, independent proceedings and shall be tried de novo. (B) If an action is an appeal from an order or determination of an administrative agency, the action shall be an original proceeding in the nature of a suit to set aside the order or determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.