Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Ariz. 465 - State v. Castro

State v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Ramsey (2005), State v. Kiper (1994)

27 state decisions

16019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · Brown v. United States · McDougall v. North Carolina · State v. Adamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'in a light most favorable to its proponent, maximizing its probative value and minimizing its prejudicial effect.' ” State v. Castro, 163 Ariz. 465, 473 , 788 P.2d 1216, 1224 (App.1989), quoting Untied States v. Jamil, 707 F.2d 638, 642 (2d Cir.1983) (emphasis in Castro); see also United States v. Denberg, 212 F.3d 987, 993 (7th Cir.2000) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To conclude that Pope is applicable ... is not the end of analysis where sexual history is concerned. It should not have taken until Pope in 1976 for the law to determine that a woman’s history of sexual relations is probative neither of her veracity as a witness nor of her consent to sexual relations in a given instance. There may, however, be other probative purposes than these, and Pope does not proscribe them all.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.