Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Ariz. 58 - State v. Pac

State v. Pac’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Crowder · McFarland v. Cassady · State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before accepting a plea of guilty or no contest, the court shall address defendant personally in open court, informing him of and determining that he understands the following: b. The nature and range of possible sentence for the offense to which the plea is offered, including any special conditions regarding sentence, parole, or commutation imposed by statute ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.