Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Cal. App. 2d 568 - People v. Carr

163 Cal. App. 2d 568 - People v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1997 · most notably 56 Cal. 2d 720 - People v. Love (1961), Kenneth Jones v. United States of America, Willis Campbell, Jr. v. United States (1964)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

19019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 40 Cal. 2d 876 - People v. Daugherty · 42 Cal. 2d 246 - People v. Ashley · 27 Cal. 2d 478 - People v. Adamson · 30 Cal. 2d 676 - People v. Eggers · 39 Cal. 2d 719 - People v. Kirkes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘ The evidence at bar is not so strong in its support of the verdict that it does not appear reasonable to believe that the misconduct of the deputy district attorney contributed materially to the jury’s determination of guilt. This was a close case on facts. The remarks of the prosecuting attorney in his opening statement, coupled with his comment on the evidence in his closing argument, viewed in their entirety and cumulative effect in relation to the state of the evidence, convince us that the misconduct of the deputy district attorney was so prejudicial as to result in depriving defendants of a fair trial.” (Italicsadded.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.