Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.1d 1002 - In re Appel

In re Appel’s Empirical Analysis

163 F. 1002 · 1908

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 1926
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Sun Printing Publishing Association v. William L Moore · Griswold v. Hazard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We recognize that weighty courts have held that, while a bond given to procure the release of one arrested under a writ of ne exeat regno differs from an ordinary bail bond in requiring the constant presence of tbe principal within the jurisdiction, yet the chief object of the two obligations is the same, viz. to obtain security that the principal shall abide [not perform] any decree which the court may render against him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.