Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.1d 539 - Kilbourn v. Hirner

Kilbourn v. Hirner’s Empirical Analysis

163 F. 539 · 1908

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
August 1915
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Appert v. Brownsville Plate Glass Co. · Stonemetz Printers' Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding-Mach. Co. · United States Repair & Guaranty Co. v. Standard Paving Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No doubt, if the situation were reversed, and if this were a suit for infringement brought by the complainants, and the defendant were seeking to file a cross-bill to secure the hearing provided for by section 4915, the defense thus offered would perhaps be legitimate and germane."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.