Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.1d 929 - Waskey v. McNaught

Waskey v. McNaught’s Empirical Analysis

163 F. 929 · 1908

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
October 1935
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Erhardt Boaro · Erhardt v. Boaro · Curtis v. Sutter · McHenry v. . Jewett · Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. Clarkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The new system not only permits but encourages— and in spirit, I believe, requires — such a union and combination, for one of its elementary notions is that all the possible disputes or controversies arising out of, or connected with, the same subject-matter or transaction should be settled in a single judicial action. * * * ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.