Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.2d 593 - Clainos v. United States

Clainos v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

163 F.2d 593 · 1947

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
3
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably Lyles v. United States (1957), Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore (1958)

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

330194719501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palmer v. Hoffman · Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson, Commissioner of Agriculture & Industries · New York Life Ins. v. Taylor · United States v. Cotter · United States v. Skidmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I suggest — and this is only a suggestion — -that perhaps you can make orderly progress and most expeditious progress if you proceed systematically and take the various counts of the indictment, one by one, and reach a conclusion on each count, if you can, separately. If you should come to a situation where you can agree on a verdict on some of the counts, but not on the others, come in and return a verdict on those counts that you can agree on and then we will determine whether to send you back and ask you to deliberate on other counts. In that way, I think you will find that progress can be made most effectively as well as most systematically.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.