Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.2d 877 - Sellers v. Johnson

Sellers v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

163 F.2d 877 · 1947

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2004

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

501947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Whitney v. People of State of California · 69 F. Supp. 778 - Sellers v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The theory that a group of individuals may be deprived of their constitutional rights of assembly, speech and worship if they have become so unpopular with, or offensive to, the people of a community that their presence in a public park to deliver a Bible lecture is likely to result in riot and bloodshed * * *. Under such a doctrine, unpopular political, racial, and religious groups might find themselves virtually inarticulate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Every person who, under color of any statute, regulation, custom or usage of any State . . . subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and the laws shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.