Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.3d 1073 - Bean v. Calderon

Bean v. Calderon’s Empirical Analysis

163 F.3d 1073 · 1998

Citation profile

181
cited by 181 later decisions
6
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

80 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 181 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably 39 Cal. 4th 826 - People v. Rogers (2006), Silva v. Woodford (2002)

80 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

13901998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Lindh v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he propriety of consolidation rests within the sound discretion of the state trial judge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the impermissible joinder had a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the ineffectiveness at issue . . . did not arise from failure to employ novel or neoteric tactics. Rather, it resulted from inadequacies in rudimentary trial preparation and presentation . . . [for example,] conducting an adequate investigation, and preparing witnesses for trial testimony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.