Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.3d 1369 - Family Service Agency San Francisco v. National Labor Relations Board

Family Service Agency San Francisco v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

163 F.3d 1369 · 1999

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably North of Market Senior Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2000), Alois Box Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (2000)

15 federal appellate ·

160199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 431

Relies on American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co. · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Sumter Plywood Corp. · Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “nature and extent of the electioneering, whether it happened within a designated 'no electioneering' area, whether it was contrary to the instructions of the Board's election agent, whether a party to the election objected to it, and whether a party to the election engaged in it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was, or could have been, raised in the representation proceeding. Denial of a request for review shall constitute an affirmance of the regional director's action which shall also preclude relitigating any such issues in any related subsequent unfair labor practice proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “prolonged conversations between representatives of any party to the election and voters waiting to cast ballots,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.