Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 F.3d 616 - University of the District of the Columbia Faculty Ass'n/NEA v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

University of the District of the Columbia Faculty Ass'n/NEA v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority’s Empirical Analysis

163 F.3d 616 · 1998

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Trans-Pacific Policing Agreement v. United States Customs Service (1999), Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. v. PPR Realty, Inc. (2000)

9 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

100199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Vaca v. Sipes · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Allied Structural Steel Company v. Spannaus · Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to infer that, when Congress gave the agency authority to review and approve new CBAs, it simultaneously meant to prohibit the agency from modifying existing CBAs, and that it was improper for the district court to assume that, because Congress was silent as to existing CBAs, it meant to exclude such agreements from the agency's authority. Id. The court rejected this argument, relying on the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ppellants' premise that the [agency] has the authority to do anything that is not expressly prohibited by [the governing statute] is quite extraordinary and we reject it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “fundamental principle of statutory interpretation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.