Alexander v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
163 F.3d 906 · 1998
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2023
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal · Nobles v. Johnson · Whitehead v. Johnson · Ohio, Department of Taxation v. Internal Revenue Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] State shall not be deemed to have waived the exhaustion requirement or be estopped from reliance upon the requirement unless the State, through counsel, expressly waives the requirement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A habeas petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims is a 'mixed' petition which should be dismissed without prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Graham v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.