Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 FAPPX 111 - Shaffer v. Meyers

Shaffer v. Meyers’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
April 2007
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Mickens-Thomas v. Vaughn · Richardson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prima facie it does not seem likely that the criteria cited by the Board in Shaffer’s case — participation in a treatment program for sex offenders, the recommendation of the Department of Corrections, Shaffer’s conduct record and whether he completed any prescribed programs — would not have been considered by the Board pre-amendment, and Shaffer cites no evidence to persuade us otherwise. But even if we assume that the Board would have used different criteria pre-amendment, Shaffer has not provided adequate reasons to support the contention that application of those criteria would likely have resulted in his release on parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.