Ziemack v. Centel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2016
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.