In re Luscombe Engineering Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1959
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Sargeant v. Grimes · 63 F. Supp. 1008 - In Re Public Ledger, Inc. · Pacific Western Oil Co. v. McDuffie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I am unable to agree with this conclusion of the referee. The words used in the offer, petition, and order do refer to the contract, but I do not construe them as referring to assumption or performance of it. The references are in the main to price and payment under the contract. Payment, moreover, was to be at a time earlier than that called for by the contract. In addition the words called for delivery of the tools and dies immediately, and not at the end of the period specified in the contract. These details do not constitute performance of the contract, but a radical departure from its terms.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in accordance with our contract with the bankrupt”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.