Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 GA 444 - Duke v. Ayers

Duke v. Ayers’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1998

10 state decisions

4019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parrott v. Baker · Gilliard v. Johnston & Miller · Cooper v. Chamblee · Butts v. State · Simmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If these deeds were instruments executed to secure a debt, they vested the legal title to these lands in Duke, subject to be defeated by payment of the debt. They vested in Duke legal estates which he could sell, assign, or convey to secure debt. The lands are subject to levy and sale under judgments against the vendee. The purchaser at sheriff’s sale would acquire the right to receive the money due on the secured debt. [Citations.]” Also, in the case of Richey v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce, 180 Ga. 751 (4) ( 180 SE 740 ) this court said:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.