Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 GAAPP 148 - Duncan v. State

Duncan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
9
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Ogden (1994), Woodard v. State (2015)

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

1901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Moore v. Illinois · Stevens v. State · Tribble v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The practice of municipalities which allows law enforcement officers while off-duty and in uniform, to serve as peace-keepers in private establishments open to the public is in the public interest. The presence of uniform officers in places susceptible to breaches of the peace deters unlawful acts and conduct by patrons in those places. The public knows the uniform and the badge stand for the authority of the government. The public generally knows that law enforcement officers have the duty to serve and protect them at all times.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in the lawful discharge of [their] official duties”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to enforce the law and maintain the peace.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.