Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Ind. App. 377 - Jenkins v. Yoder

163 Ind. App. 377 - Jenkins v. Yoder’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2006

11 state decisions

601975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ball Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners · State Ex Rel. State Board of Tax Commission v. Daviess Circuit Court · Hamilton County Council v. State Ex Rel. Groff · 110 Ind. App. 668 - Fashion Thimble Shoe Company v. Withrow · McKinley v. REVIEW BOARD OF INDIANA EMP. SEC. DIV.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[in computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by order of the court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is: [] a Saturday, [] a Sunday, [] a legal holiday as defined by state statute, or [ ] a day the office in which the act is to be done is closed during regular business hours. In any event, the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, a legal holiday, or a day on which the office is closed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.