Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 KAN 700 - Heiserman v. Aikman

Heiserman v. Aikman’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1973
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1973

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

601947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reading Township v. Telfer · Corley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Howard v. Zimmerman · Anthony v. Kiefner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . An enterprise is simply a project or undertaking, and a joint enterprise is simply one participated in by associates acting together. The basis of liability of one associate in a joint enterprise for the tort of another is equal privilege to control the method and means of accomplishing the common design. If the means employed be an instrumentality negligent use of which inflicts injury, the associate whom the law regards as participating in the conduct of the actor must have had equal control over its use. This control, however, need not have extended to actual manipulation at the time injury was inflicted. It is sufficient that, at the beginning of the enterprise, or as it progressed, or at any time before the tortious event, he possessed equal authority to prescribe conditions of use.” (1. c. 79.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . It cannot be that one who merely secures from another the favor of transportation in a private vehicle takes upon herself or himself all risk of the driver’s negligence en route. . . .” (1. c. 801.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.