Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 KY 488 - Mansfield v. Commonwealth

Mansfield v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
3
states following
May 1975
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently May 1975 · most notably State v. Jones (1975), State v. Clements (1926)

61 state decisions

2301915192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence that would justify the trial court in setting aside a verdict on the ground that one of the jurors had expressed opinions that would disqualify him from sitting in the case, if they had been known, should be very clear and convincing, when first brought to the attention of the court after the verdict. If new trials could readily be secured after the verdict on grounds like these, the temptation to procure the needed evidence and the ease with which it could be procured, would result in many new trials being granted on this ground when the verdict should not be disturbed.”,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “£ £ The judge, who presided when this motion for a change of venue was heard . . . was, as we may' well assume, acquainted with the people and public sentiment of the county. After hearing the witnesses introduced in behalf of both parties, his conclusion was that the defendants could have a fair trial in (Hardin county), and in this conclusion, after carefully reading the record, we concur. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.