Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Miss. 535 - Long v. State

Long v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Blue v. State (1996), McGarrh v. State (1963)

30 state decisions

80193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Melton v. State · Illinois Central Railroad v. Schultz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is objected that the court erred in permitting the district attorney, over objection, to state that his deliberate judgment was that the defendant was guilty of manslaughter, and, when the court declined to exclude it, he repeated this statement. This statement was within the limitation of legitimate argument. While it might be more prudent and better ethics to draw inferences, without stating his personal opinion, from the testimony, it was permissible for him to state his conclusions to the jury. The very purpose of an advocate is to help the jury draw conclusions from the evidence and to make suggestions of what is a proper conclusion, and to give such reasons as occur to counsel as to what conclusions should be so drawn. ( 163 Miss. at 548 , 141 So. at 594 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a person is doing an unlawful act, or doing a lawful act in an unlawful manner, and the doing of the act results in the death of another person, the result is not excusable or justifiable; and if not malicious or premeditated, or done under circumstances showing a disregard for social duty, or bent on mischief, it would amount to manslaughter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(b) when committed by accident and misfortune, in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.