Ex parte Bugg’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2015 · most notably Ex parte United States (1916), Shields v. Beto (1967)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of Sessions · Commonwealth v. John Dowdican's Bail · People ex rel. Boenert v. Barrett · State v. Hockett · In re Webb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not mean to be understood as holding that the lapse of three years or any specific time should be sufficient or be required in all cases to bar the enforcement of a judgment similar to this one, but each case should rest upon its own peculiar facts and such course followed as will best promote the ends of justice. The fine assessed may yet be collected in the same manner as if it were a judgment in a civil case. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marsh v. Henderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.