Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 N.C. App. 246 - Anderson v. Lackey

163 N.C. App. 246 - Anderson v. Lackey’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Smith · Shipman v. Shipman · 139 N.C. App. 222 - Brewer v. Brewer · 122 N.C. App. 518 - Hancock v. Hancock · 138 N.C. App. 135 - Evans v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Adequate notice is defined as notice reasonably calculated, under all circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. Furthermore, in Danielson v. Cummings, this Court held that no written notice of a motion was required to effectuate adequate notice to the opposing party where the motion was announced in open court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.