Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 N.C. App. 646 - State v. Shepherd

163 N.C. App. 646 - State v. Shepherd’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] prerequisite to our engaging in a “plain error” analysis is the determination that the [trial court’s action] constitutes “error” at all. Then “before deciding that an error by the trial court amounts to ‘plain error,’ the appellate court must be convinced that absent the error the jury probably would have reached a different verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.