163 N.C. App. 696 - State v. Pullen’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Odom · Melka Marine, Inc. v. United States · Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`must examine the entire record and determine if the ... error had a probable impact on the jury's finding of guilt.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although [co-defendant] recanted that confession at trial, it was the responsibility of the jury, and not the trial court, to decide whether to give greater weight to [co-defendant's] trial testimony than his original confession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he trial court must consider such evidence in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.