Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Neb. 642 - Vasa v. Vasa

Vasa v. Vasa’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1999

8 state decisions

2019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrill County v. Bliss · Ellis v. Karl · Mueller v. Keeley · Fisk v. Thorp · Kime v. Fenner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This situation does not go to a procedural irregularity but to the power of the court and the legality of the order. Any judgment or ruling so entered without authority or jurisdiction is void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.