State v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably State v. Lass (1975), State v. Brown (1969)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Temple v. United States · Des Moines Blue Ribbon Distributors, Inc. v. Drewrys Ltd. U. S. A. · State v. Lámar · State v. Schmidt · State v. Daves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Ordinarily matters not raised in the trial court, including constitutional questions, cannot be effectively asserted the first time on appeal. State v. Everett, Iowa, 157 N.W.2d 144, 148 . See also State v. LaMar, Iowa, 151 N.W.2d 496, 503-504 . “And objections made as to any instruction must specify the ground of error or irregularity relied upon. Code section 780.-35; rule 196, R.C.P.; and State v. Bamsey, 208 Iowa 796, 800-801 , 223 N.W. 873 , cert. den. 280 U.S. 595 , 50 S.Ct. 40 , 74 L.Ed. 642 . “Furthermore, an accused desiring additional or more specific instructions must make timely request therefor. State v. Hardesty, Iowa, 153 N.W.2d 464, 471 , and State v. Fiedler, Iowa, 152 N.W.2d 236, 240-241 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schatterman““Definition- — punishment. If any person, with force or violence, or by putting in fear, steal and take from the person of another any property that is the subject of larceny, he is guilty of robbery, and shall be punished according to the aggravation of the offense, as is provided in sections 711.2 an'd 711.3.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Youngbear
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.