In Re William B.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · In re Agler · 101 Ohio App. 3d 245 - In Re Christopher R. · 123 Ohio App. 3d 448 - In Re Sappington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATED [APPELLANT'S] RIGHT TO COUNSEL AND RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS UNDER THE FIFTH , SIXTH , AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE I , SECTION SIXTEEN OF THE OHIO CONSTITUTION, OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 2151.352 , AND JUVENILE RULES 4 AND 35."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT FAILED TO APPOINT A GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR [APPELLANT] IN VIOLATION OF OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 2151.281 (A) AND JUVENILE RULE 4(B)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appellant was advised that in order to be afforded his constitutional rights, including his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, he would have to deny the charges levied against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.