State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · Darden v. Wainwright · Smith v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, prosecutors are entitled to considerable latitude in opening statement and closing argument. In closing argument, a prosecutor may comment freely on 'what the evidence has shown and what reasonable inferences may be drawn therefrom.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`remarks were improper, and if so, whether they prejudicially affected substantial rights of the defendant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The touchstone of analysis `is the fairness of the trial, not the culpability of the prosecutor.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.