Vinicky v. Pristas’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2024
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Peterson v. Teodosio · York v. Ohio State Highway Patrol · State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. Pontious · Cater v. City of Cleveland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a court (1) construes the material allegations in the complaint, with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, in favor of the nonmoving party as true, and (2) finds beyond doubt, that the plaintiff could prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“brief and sketchy allegations of fact to survive a motion to dismiss under the notice pleading rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“limited solely to the allegations in the pleadings and any writings attached to the pleadings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.