State v. Redman’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2020
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. · Kilbreath v. Rudy · State v. White · 118 Ohio App. 3d 121 - State v. Rowe · 81 Ohio App. 3d 821 - State v. Redman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a permanent taking without the expectation of reinstatement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Ohio trial courts do not possess the inherent authority to suspend, cancel, or modify a criminal sentence once that sentence has been executed, absent specific statutory authority to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“falls within the definition of 'remedial' because it has no effect on substantial rights, but rather provides a course of procedure for the enforcement of rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gregoire
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.